Our flagship advisory tool

Development AI — the advisory companion for leaders

A consulting-grade AI built for strategy, finance, and operations decisions. Frameworks, benchmarks, and sector intelligence — in a single conversational interface designed for the way leaders actually work.

Development AI
How should we approach a market entry case?
I would start with the decision to make, then size demand, map constraints, test routes to market, and turn the answer into a workplan.
What it is

Not another general-purpose chatbot. A working surface for consultants and leaders.

Development AI is trained on the same frameworks, sector taxonomies, and benchmark structures our consultants use day to day. It connects to your documents, your spreadsheets, and your sector data — and produces output that holds up in a steering-committee room.

You can ask it to size a market, build a financial sensitivity, draft a board memo, or stress-test an assumption against five comparable engagements. It returns structured answers with sources, not paragraphs of plausible-sounding text.

And because it was built inside a consultancy, it asks the next question. If you say "we are considering an acquisition," it won't write you an essay. It will ask which sector, which size, and what your strategic frame is — the way an analyst would.

Capabilities

Six things it does exceptionally well

01 · Frameworks

Strategy frameworks on tap

Porter, BCG, value-chain decomposition, jobs-to-be-done, McKinsey 7S — Development AI applies the right frame for the right question, and tells you when none of them fit.

02 · Benchmarks

Sector benchmarks built in

Margin structures, capex intensity, working-capital norms, and operational KPIs for 12 sectors — sourced from Kaya engagements and published filings.

03 · Decision support

Structured decision support

Build a weighted decision matrix in three turns. Stress-test it against scenarios. Surface the assumptions that change the answer.

04 · Documents

Document & data analysis

Upload a 200-page tender, a 12-tab model, or a regulator's response. Ask questions in plain language and get cited, traceable answers.

05 · Drafting

Memo & slide drafting

Generate first-draft memos in the Kaya house style, with executive summary, supporting evidence, and risks. Slides export to a clean .pptx scaffold.

06 · Workflows

Custom workflows

Save your most-used routines — board prep, weekly KPI review, deal screening — as one-click workflows that pull from your live data.

How it works

Three steps from question to answer

01

Connect

Bring in your documents, models, and data rooms. Development AI builds a private workspace per engagement — your data never leaves it.

02

Ask

Ask the way you would ask a senior analyst. Development AI clarifies the question, picks the frame, and returns a structured answer with sources.

03

Act

Take the answer into a memo, a slide, a model, or a decision log. Every artefact carries its sources — so the next reviewer can audit the chain.

A real exchange

Watch it think

You
We're evaluating an acquisition in renewable-energy services in Türkiye. Target does about ₺680m revenue, EBITDA margin around 14%. Asking price implies ~9.5x EBITDA. Is that fair?
Development AI
A few clarifying questions before I size the answer:
1) Is this asset-heavy (O&M of solar/wind sites) or asset-light (engineering & advisory)?
2) Is the 14% margin trending up or down over the last three years?
3) Are you assuming a control premium, or is this a minority stake?

Quick framing in the meantime: comparable Turkish renewables-services transactions in 2023–25 cleared at 7.0–8.4x EBITDA (median 7.6x). 9.5x is at the high end and would need either growth above sector (~12% CAGR) or a strategic synergy story to defend.
Sources: Kaya M&A benchmark database (renewables services, EMEA, 2023–25, n=14); published transaction filings.
You
Asset-light. Margin is up from 11% in 2023 to 14% in 2025. Control stake.
Development AI
That changes the picture meaningfully. Asset-light services with expanding margins deserve a premium — the sector's expansion-stage comparables sit at 9–11x EBITDA, not 7–8x.

9.5x is now defensible but not cheap. To justify it, your investment case needs at least one of:
• 15%+ revenue CAGR over the next 4 years (vs sector ~12%)
• Margin path to 17%+ (your bid implies you believe in continued expansion)
• Identified synergies worth ≥ ₺120m NPV (≈ 1.3x EBITDA of headroom)

Want me to draft a one-page IC pre-read on these three?
Sources: Kaya M&A benchmark database; comparable transaction analysis, EMEA renewables services, expansion stage, 2024–25.
Pricing

Three ways to get started

Individual
$899 /mo
For consultants & independent advisors
  • Limited token-based conversations
  • Document analysis up to 200 pages
  • Sector benchmark access (3 sectors)
  • Memo & slide drafting
  • 14-day workspace history
Start a trial
Enterprise
Custom
For firms, banks, ministries
  • Everything in Team
  • Single-tenant deployment
  • Private model fine-tuning
  • SOC 2, ISO 27001, KVKK alignment
  • Dedicated success partner
  • SSO & audit logging
Get a quote
Frequently asked

What people ask us first

No. We use frontier models underneath, but the consulting layer — frameworks, sector taxonomies, benchmark databases, the asking-the-next-question behavior — is proprietary. The model knows physics; we taught the layer to think like an analyst.

On Team and Individual, data is encrypted in transit and at rest, never used to train shared models, and deleted on workspace closure. On Enterprise, we deploy single-tenant in your region of choice — Türkiye, EU, US, or UK — and you hold the keys.

Benchmarks are refreshed quarterly and carry sample-size disclosure. If a benchmark is based on fewer than five comparables, Development AI tells you and offers ranges rather than point estimates. We'd rather say "we don't know" than make up a number.

Enterprise customers can deploy on a private cloud or on-prem with reduced model footprints. Some capabilities — particularly the largest models — require connectivity. We will tell you which features lose fidelity in an air-gapped setup before you commit.

It replaces the parts of analyst work that should never have been there — reformatting tables, looking up the same benchmark three ways, redrafting the same memo. It does not replace judgment, client conversations, or the discipline of being wrong in front of a steering committee.

Three layers. Retrieval is grounded in your documents and our benchmark database. Every numerical claim is cited; if it cannot be cited, the tool says "estimated" and shows its working. And the output is structured — when an answer doesn't fit a known frame, the tool surfaces that, instead of inventing certainty.

Try Development AI on a live decision.

We'll set up a workspace for one of your active questions. If it doesn't earn its place, you walk away.